New York Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney

New York Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney

A November nyc State casino referendum for voters has one lawyer questioning the ballot’s wording

In November, ny voters are scheduled to vote on a referendum that will allow several casino that is new to be built through the state. But if one Brooklyn lawyer is effective, that referendum shall be halted due to language in the ballot question he claims violates state legislation.

Referendum Language Questioned

The language in the referendum carries a quantity of ‚legislative purposes‘ that paint the proposition in a light that is unmistakably positive. For instance, the question mentions ‚promoting work growth, increasing aid to schools and allowing regional governments to lower property taxes.‘ That language was approved by hawaii Board of Elections in July.

But now, attorney Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York legislation. According to case filed within the New York State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the continuing State Constitution’s prohibition on the usage of general public money in the aid of ‚private undertakings.‘

‚The Constitution is pretty clear that you cannot use money that is public sway or influence a vote,‘ Snyder said.

Snyder isn’t the one that is only has brought up problems with the language in the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also notice it as one-sided, and groups that are religious also noted the language Pokračovat ve čtení „New York Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney“